Bhakta: "You once spoke about mantra smaraṇa. What is that?"
Advaitadas:
"It is meditation on the mantras one receives from Guru during
second initiation."
Bhakta: "Can
one whisper these mantras?"
Advaitadas:
"No, one should do them fully mentally, not even whispered. They are
secret gifts from Guru. Therefore the English verb 'chanting' does not apply to
this practise, as chanting indicates loud utterance."
Bhakta: "When
chanting (nāma-) japa, apart from listening to the sound you have to
think something, like I am a servant or so?"
Advaitadas: "Śrī
Ānanda Gopāl Gosvāmī teaches that when you meditate on Kṛṣṇa's pastimes, in the
beginning you will have the ahamtā of 'I am sitting down here and
meditating', but if you go deeper you will lose that self esteem and just merge
into the līlā. The holy name must descend upon your spiritual identity.
When you are doing kīrtan or japa there must be some attitude on
the background, just like my PC is constantly processing all kinds of things on
the background while I am working on it, without me noticing it. In such a subtle
way the service attitude must be present while doing one's sādhana. A
greedy businessman doesn’t always think 'O I'm so greedy I'm so greedy' - no,
he just acts according to his desires, without pondering his motives. Similarly
the bhakta just works for Kṛṣṇa's pleasure,
thinking only of that. In the beginning one thinks: "I am doing this sadhana for the grace of Guru and Gaurāṅga",
while later one starts identifying with one's manjari
svarupa. See, for instance, Viśvanātha Cakravartī's commentary on Śrīmad
Bhāgavat 10.29.10-11:
guṇamayo’pi
bhavatīti bhakta-dehasyāṁśena nirguṇatvaṁ guṇa-mayatvaṁ ca syāt | tataś
ca—bhaktiḥ pareśānubhavo viraktiḥ [bhā.pu. 11.2.42] iti tuṣṭiḥ puṣṭiḥ
kṣud-apāyo’nu-ghāsam iti nyāyena bhakti-vṛddhi-tāratamyena nirguṇa-dehāṁśānām
ādhikya-tāratamyaṁ syāt | tena ca guṇamaya-dehāṁśānāṁ kṣīṇatva-tāratamyaṁ syāt,
sampūrṇa-premaṇy utpanne tu guṇamaya-dehāṁśeṣu naṣṭeṣu samyak nirguṇa eva dehaḥ
syāt tad api sthūla-deha-pātas tu bahirmukhatotkhātā bhāvārthaṁ bhakti-yogasya
rahasyatva-rakṣārthaṁ ca bhagavataiva māyayā pradarśyate, yathā mauṣala-līlāyāṁ
yādavānāṁ kvacit tu, bhakti-yogotkarṣa-jñāpanārthaṁ na darśyate ca, yathā
dhruvādīnām
“Though it is made
of three modes of nature, a part of the devotee’s body is spiritualized and a
part is material. It is said in Śrīmad Bhāgavat (11.2.42) that the more one
eats the more one is nourished, loses hunger and is satisfied. Similarly, the
more one advances in bhakti the more one’s body is spiritualized and
loses its material aspects. When prema is complete the material portion of the
body is destroyed and it becomes fully spiritual. To protect the feelings of the bahirmukhas (non-devotees) and the confidentiality
of bhakti yoga the Lord shows through His maya (the demise of the
devotee’s) material body, as He did during the Mauṣal-pastime (wherein the Yadu
dynasty destroyed itself in genocidal civil war). On the other hand, the
excellence of bhakti yoga can be shown also in the case of
Dhruva (who left this world in his very body, which had become totally
spiritualized)."
Some ridicule Vaiṣṇavas
for practising mañjarī
bhāva while having material
engagements or desires, but the ācāryas are consistently teaching this
is a gradual process, whereby material and spiritual awareness more or less overlap
each other. The above quotation is really not the only one of its kind. Viśvanātha
repeats it in his commentary on Śrīmad Bhāgavat 11.9.23 and in Mādhurya Kādambini."
Bhakta:
"Sometimes it seems that it's impossible to become Kṛṣṇa-conscious in the
west, where the culture and environment are so unfavorable."
Advaitadas: 'Where
there's a will there's a way. Rūpa and Sanātana did bhajan while working
for the Muslims, Prahlād did bhajan in the house of Hiraṇyakaśipu. It's
illogical to think that Mahāprabhu has given us foreigners the opportunity to
do bhajan without the prospect of accomplishment. Kṛṣṇa says in Bhagavad Gītā
(9.31) kaunteya
pratijānīhi na me bhakta praṇaśyati "Arjun! I
promise (pratijānīhi) that My devotee does not perish!"
EDITING
THE STAVAMĀLĀ
The Stavamala is a
great source, along with the other works of Rūpa Gosvāmī, of all the wonderful granthas
the later ācāryas have composed, like Govinda Līlāmṛta and Kṛṣṇa Bhāvanāmṛta.
One devotee checked it with me:
Bhakta: "In Rūpa
Gosvāmī's Keśavāṣṭakam, verse 1, it is said in an English translation: 'Kṛṣṇa
is wearing a brāhmin thread of flowers' - I didn't know He wears a brāhmin
thread in Vraja and then why would He wear one of flowers?'
Advaitadas: 'The
word vaikākṣaka in the verse
refers to a thread which is worn on the left shoulder, under the right arm,
which is exactly the position of the brāhmin thread. But yes, you're right, Kṛṣṇa
doesn’t wear a brahmin thread in Vraja. Gopāl Campū says Kṛṣṇa could not marry
in Vraja because He had not undergone the sacred thread ceremony yet. Either
this type of a garland is one of the romantic eccentricities of Kṛṣṇa, or it is
a poetic metaphor. Such an apparel of Kṛṣṇa has not been mentioned anywhere
else, to my knowledge."
Bhakta: "In Rūpa
Gosvāmī's third Caitanyāṣṭakam, verse 7, it is said, in one English
translation, that He has 'sleepless lotus-eyes'. Is that right?"
Advaitadas:
"No that is not right. The words used here are 'anidrā
padmekṣaṇa' in
which anidrā, not sleeping, means 'blooming'. When the lotus flowers go
to sleep at night they close their petals and when they wake in the morning
they open them. That blooming of the lotus flowers is called 'not sleeping'. anidrā
is an adjective here of the lotus, not of the eyes."
Bhakta: "In Rūpa
Gosvāmī's Līlāmṛtākhya stotram verse 3, one English translation says rādhā
mānābhāsa vaśīkṛta "Kṛṣṇa
is controlled by the shadow of the jealous anger of Rādhā'
Advaitadas:
"It is perhaps more clear to use the word 'semblance' than 'shadow',
though strictly speaking 'shadow' is not wrong for the word ābhāsa."
Bhakta: "In Rūpa
Gosvāmī's Premendu Sāgara', verse 43, the wager is a kiss. But what is the
difference between getting kissed or giving the kiss?"
Advaitadas:
"Hahaha - yes, somewhere in the Gosvāmīs' books, I can’t remember where, Śrī
Rādhikā is complaining about such a wager, because in the case of a full kiss
on the mouth, indeed it makes no difference - there is neither a winner nor
loser. If the kiss is given on the cheek of course it is different."
Bhakta: "In
the sense of pleasure, who is the loser when a kiss is given on the
cheeks?"
Advaitadas:
"Ah, it is more a question of losing prestige in front of one's friends
more than anything else."
Bhakta: "In
Keśavāṣṭakam, verse 4, one English translation says: 'Kṛṣṇa's cheeks are licked
by a stream of perspiration"
Advaitadas: 'It
could have been put a bit more delicately - (Gauḍīya Maṭh's) Arpaṇā Devī's
Bengali translation says 'His cheeks are beautified by drops of perspiration'.
Strictly speaking the Sanskrit word 'līḍha' does
mean licked or devoured, but I think Arpaṇā Devī made a more gentle
interpretation. Also English translators must beware of rasābhāsa and of jugupsa rati, the mellow
of disgust, which never applies to Śrī Kṛṣṇa."
Bhakta: "In
the English translation of text 6 of Keśavāṣṭakam it is said: "He wears a
garland of dust"
Advaitadas:
"It is as if the translation was made by some software or so. Rūpa Gosvāmī
speaks of dhūli-dhūmra-srajam, which
is translated by Arpaṇā Devī as 'a flower-garland which is greyed by the dust
thrown up by the hooves of the cows." That much is obvious."
Bhakta:
"Elsewhere in Stavamālā it is said that Kṛṣṇa wears golden dhātu tilak. What is
that?"
Advaitadas: "dhātu
tilak means tilak made of pigments collected from the
base of Girirāja Govardhan."
Bhakta: "In
Mukundāṣṭakam, verse 1, the first lines are translated here as 'May Mukunda,
Who, with His saffron splendour, crushes the luster of sapphire....." I thought
Kṛṣṇa was blue?"
Advaitadas:
"The 2nd line says that Kṛṣṇa wears powder like kunkum saffron splendour
on His charming form, which is itself of a sapphire splendour (balabhid
upala kānti)."
Bhakta:
"Verse 3 of Mukundāṣṭakam says Kṛṣṇa wears a red garment. I thought He wore
yellow. Is this like a kurtā or so?"
Advaitadas:
"No it is a scarf around the neck."
Some ridicule Vaishnavas for practising manjari bhava while having material engagements or desires, but the Acaryas are consistently teaching this is a gradual process, whereby material and spiritual awareness more or less overlap each other.
ReplyDeleteDoes overlapping means that one is meditating on his or her siddha deha and suddenly his mind goes to his first crush (EX girlfriend)? if this happening so one should stop meditation, work on napa japa or by continuing this meditation he will soon be purified?
Also give some links where we can read on correct meditaion or process of sadhana.
Anon, please peruse my blog of May 25, 2007 for this.
ReplyDelete